11/20/2022 0 Comments The book of daniel commentaryExpert replies to this argument have been composed by Eusebius, Apollinarius, and previously in part by Methodius. So whatever he mentions up to the time of Antiochus is true history, but whatever he touches on after that time, because the writer could not foretell the future, is fiction. He said that the book of Daniel was written not by the man whom it is named after, but by someone who lived in Judaea at the time of Antiochus Epiphanes and so instead of Daniel predicting the future, this writer describes what has already happened. In his twelfth book Porphyrius wrote about the prophet Daniel. The Latin text is available on the monumenta.ch website. Archer, can be found on the Tertullian website. A complete translation of Jerome's commentary on Daniel, made by Gleason L. The references in green are to St.Jerome's commentary. They are translated from Jacoby's text in FGrH_260. Some passages about the historical basis of the book of Daniel have survived, because they were quoted in St.Jerome's commentary on Daniel. Not surprisingly, the whole work was banned when the Roman Empire became officially Christian, and all remaining copies were publicly burnt in 448 A.D. These extracts come from a long polemic, "Against the Christians", which Porphyrius wrote in the late third century A.D. Porphyrius: Comments on Daniel - translation Porphyrius: Comments on the book of Daniel
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |